Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11997496›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2002

Antagonistic interactions between yeast [PSI(+)] and [URE3] prions and curing of [URE3] by Hsp70 protein chaperone Ssa1p but not by Ssa2p.

Christine Schwimmer, Daniel C Masison

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A SingleInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Differential Interactions of Molecular Chaperones and Yeast Prions.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mechanisms for Curing Yeast Prions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. How Do Yeast Cells Contend with Prions?International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Genetics · 2018
    Article
  20. Review

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christine SchwimmerLaboratory of Biochemistry and Genetics, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-0851, USA.
Daniel C Masison
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Yeast Prions and Hsp70 chaperonesZIADK024946 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI MASISON, DANIEL · 2009 to 2025
$10.1M
Yeast Prions and Hsp70 chaperonesZ01DK024946 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI MASISON, DANIEL C. · 1998 to 2008
$797k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The yeast [PSI(+)], [URE3], and [PIN(+)] genetic elements are prion forms of Sup35p, Ure2p, and Rnq1p, respectively. Overexpression of Sup35p, Ure2p, or Rnq1p leads to increased de novo appearance of [PSI(+)], [URE3], and [PIN(+)], respectively. This inducible appearance of [PSI(+)] was shown to be dependent on the presence of [PIN(+)] or [URE3] or overexpression of other yeast proteins that have stretches of polar residues similar to the prion-determining domains of the known prion proteins. In a similar manner, [PSI(+)] and [URE3] facilitate the appearance of [PIN(+)]. In contrast to these positive interactions, here we find that in the presence of [PIN(+)], [PSI(+)] and [URE3] repressed each other's propagation and de novo appearance. Elevated expression of Hsp104 and Hsp70 (Ssa2p) had little effect on these interactions, ruling out competition between the two prions for limiting amounts of these protein chaperones. In contrast, we find that constitutive overexpression of SSA1 but not SSA2 cured cells of [URE3], uncovering a specific interaction between Ssa1p and [URE3] and a functional distinction between these nearly identical Hsp70 isoforms. We also find that Hsp104 abundance, which critically affects [PSI(+)] propagation, is elevated when [URE3] is present. Our results are consistent with the notion that proteins that have a propensity to form prions may interact with heterologous prions but, as we now show, in a negative manner. Our data also suggest that differences in how [PSI(+)] and [URE3] interact with Hsp104 and Hsp70 may contribute to their antagonistic interactions.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphatasesFungal ProteinsGenes, FungalGenetic VariationGlutathione PeroxidaseHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsPeptide Termination FactorsPrionsPromoter Regions, GeneticRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsAdenosine TriphosphatasesFungal ProteinsGlutathione PeroxidaseHeat-Shock ProteinsHsP104 protein, S cerevisiaeHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsPeptide Termination FactorsPrionsRepressor ProteinsRNQ1 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSSA1 protein, S cerevisiaeSSA2 protein, S cerevisiaeSUP35 protein, S cerevisiaeURE2 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID11997496
PMCPMC133818
OpenAlexW2137530170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.