Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11997339›Full record

ArticleGenome research2002

Structure and evolution of the Smith-Magenis syndrome repeat gene clusters, SMS-REPs.

Sung-Sup Park, Paweł Stankiewicz, Weimin Bi, Christine Shaw, Jessica Lehoczky, Ken Dewar, Bruce Birren, James R Lupski

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Journal of pediatric genetics · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evolution in health and medicine Sackler colloquium: Genomic disorders: a window into human gene and genome evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Genomic disorders ten years on.Genome medicine · 2009
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sung-Sup ParkDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA.
Paweł Stankiewicz
Weimin Bi
Christine Shaw
Jessica Lehoczky
Ken Dewar
Bruce Birren
James R Lupski
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

CENTER FOR GENOME RESEARCHU54HG002045 · NHGRI · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI LANDER, ERIC S · 1999 to 2003
$242.3M
Telomere integrity of de novo terminal deletionsP01HD039420 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LUPSKI, JAMES R. · 2001 to 2005
$4.7M
CMT Peripheral Neuropathy: IV. Genes and PathogenesisR01NS027042 · NINDS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LUPSKI, JAMES R. · 1990 to 2005
$2.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG02045NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD039420NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD39420NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS027042NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS27042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An approximately 4-Mb genomic segment on chromosome 17p11.2, commonly deleted in patients with the Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS) and duplicated in patients with dup(17)(p11.2p11.2) syndrome, is flanked by large, complex low-copy repeats (LCRs), termed proximal and distal SMS-REP. A third copy, the middle SMS-REP, is located between them. SMS-REPs are believed to mediate nonallelic homologous recombination, resulting in both SMS deletions and reciprocal duplications. To delineate the genomic structure and evolutionary origin of SMS-REPs, we constructed a bacterial artificial chromosome/P1 artificial chromosome contig spanning the entire SMS region, including the SMS-REPs, determined its genomic sequence, and used fluorescence in situ hybridization to study the evolution of SMS-REP in several primate species. Our analysis shows that both the proximal SMS-REP (approximately 256 kb) and the distal copy (approximately 176 kb) are located in the same orientation and derived from a progenitor copy, whereas the middle SMS-REP (approximately 241 kb) is inverted and appears to have been derived from the proximal copy. The SMS-REP LCRs are highly homologous (>98%) and contain at least 14 genes/pseudogenes each. SMS-REPs are not present in mice and were duplicated after the divergence of New World monkeys from pre-monkeys approximately 40-65 million years ago. Our findings potentially explain why the vast majority of SMS deletions and dup(17)(p11.2p11.2) occur at proximal and distal SMS-REPs and further support previous observations that higher-order genomic architecture involving LCRs arose recently during primate speciation and may predispose the human genome to both meiotic and mitotic rearrangements.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAbnormalities, MultipleBase CompositionCell LineCell Line, TransformedChromosomes, Human, Pair 17Cloning, MolecularContig MappingDNA FingerprintingGene DosageGene DuplicationGenome, HumanHumansIntellectual DisabilityMultigene FamilyRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid

Identifiers

PMID11997339
PMCPMC186597
OpenAlexW2103571619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.