Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11996687›Full record

ReviewEmerging infectious diseases2002

Typical and atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli.

Luiz R Trabulsi, Rogéria Keller, Tânia A Tardelli Gomes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emerging infectious diseases, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 298 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
298citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

298 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Surveillance of enteropathogenicJournal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Genomic Characterization, Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles, andAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Virulence and Antibiotic Resistance of aEPEC/STECPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  18. Using PathogenicFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

238 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luiz R TrabulsiLaboratório Especial de Microbiologia, prédio novo, 2nd andar, Instituto Butantan, Av. Vital Brasil, 1500 São Paulo, Brazil, CEP:05503-900. trabulsi@usp.br
Rogéria Keller
Tânia A Tardelli Gomes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Typical and atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) strains differ in several characteristics. Typical EPEC, a leading cause of infantile diarrhea in developing countries, is rare in industrialized countries, where atypical EPEC seems to be a more important cause of diarrhea. For typical EPEC, the only reservoir is humans; for atypical EPEC, both animals and humans can be reservoirs. Typical and atypical EPEC also differ in genetic characteristics, serotypes, and virulence properties. Atypical EPEC is more closely related to Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), and like STEC these strains appear to be emerging pathogens.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial AdhesionDeveloped CountriesDeveloping CountriesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli ProteinsGenes, BacterialHumansPrevalenceVirulenceEscherichia coli Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11996687
PMCPMC2732489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.