ReviewPaediatric drugs2002
Formulations of antibiotics for children in primary care: effects on compliance and efficacy.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3 months of age: clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2011Guideline
- Parent-reported outcomes for treatment of acute otitis media with cefdinir or amoxicillin/clavulanate oral suspensions.Paediatric drugs · 2004Trial
- Challenges prescribing and dispensing oral antibiotics with poor palatability for paediatric patients: A qualitative interview study with GPs and pharmacists.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- Characterisation of antibiotic prescriptions for acute respiratory tract infections in Danish general practice: a retrospective registry based cohort study.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2017Article
- Article
- Study of the acceptability of antibiotic syrups, suspensions, and oral solutions prescribed to pediatric outpatients.European journal of pediatrics · 2009Article
- Current issues in pediatric medication adherence.Paediatric drugs · 2007Review
- Role of beta-lactam agents in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2005Review
- Cefdinir: a review of its use in the management of mild-to-moderate bacterial infections.Drugs · 2004Review
- Modification of bitter taste in children.Developmental psychobiology · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review article is designed for pediatricians as well as primary care physicians in the outpatient setting as a clinical guide to antibiotic selection. It emphasizes variables related to compliance as well as efficacy. The aim is to give recommendations as to the choice of antibiotics, depending on factors such as taste, cost, efficacy, and compliance. Common bacterial pathogens causing infections in children are reviewed, along with their susceptibility patterns to antimicrobial agents. Emerging mechanisms of resistance, particularly the increasing resistance of pneumococci to beta-lactam antibiotics, are discussed because of their importance to antibiotic selection. Previously published studies that have examined the treatment of common outpatient infections in children, such as otitis media, streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis, and sinusitis, are summarized. Adverse reactions associated with antibiotics, second in importance only to efficacy, are reviewed. Finally, compliance issues, which include palatability, cost, duration of therapy, and administration frequency, are analyzed using recently published information related to each of these issues. The efficacy of the commonly used antibiotics for urinary tract infections, pneumonia, and streptococcal pharyngitis does not vary significantly; however, for otitis media and sinusitis, some studies have shown that treatment efficacy with the antibiotic does not vary significantly from that with placebo. Likewise, adverse reactions rarely provide a basis for antibiotic selection, since virtually all antibiotics are generally well tolerated. The final factor, compliance, is a major issue in determining both first- and second-line therapy of common outpatient infections in children. Although cost is not a factor in compliance in countries such as the UK where no copayment is required for pediatric drugs, it is of major importance in the US. This is followed by palatability, administration duration and finally administration frequency. As a group, cephalosporins are generally the best tasting but are relatively more expensive than macrolides. Antibiotics that can be given for 5 days, and just once or twice daily, are preferred by most parents and physicians. Since final assessment of antibiotic choice is likely to vary considerably among healthcare personnel, decisions must be made on an individual basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.