GuidelineIrish journal of medical science
Admissions with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease after publication of national guidelines.
Guideline in Irish journal of medical science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding Practice Patterns of COPD: A Survey of Physicians in Nepal, Sri Lanka and Malaysia.Pulmonary therapy · 2021Article
- Patients with COPD who underwent pulmonary rehabilitation in Turkey: prevalence, distribution, and mortalityTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2020Article
- Differences in care between general medicine and respiratory specialists in the management of patients hospitalized for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Annals of thoracic medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe British Thoracic Society (BTS) published guidelines on managing acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) in 1997.
aimTo audit admissions with AECOPD and to see how well these guidelines were adhered to. Methods All patients admitted were identified and 50 selected for audit.
resultsThe mean age was 72 years and 52% were female. Admission C reactive protein (CRP) and white cell count (WCC) were 49 (12.7) mg/l and 10.97 (0.64) x 10(9)/l respectively. Six were acidotic and 16 hypercapnoeic. Median length of stay (LOS) was six days. Twenty-one fulfilled admission criteria. Thirty-seven had > or = 2 Anthonisen criteria. Nine had spirometry performed. Correlations were seen between appropriateness of admission score and pH (r=-0.41, p=0.01) and LOS (r=-0.43, p=0.002) and between Anthonisen criteria score and age (r=0.33, p=0.018). Symptom score correlated with PaO2 (r=-0.38, p=0.02), LOS (r=0.27, p=0.06) and age (r=0.38, p=0.007). LOS correlated with PaCO2 (r=0.33, p=0.04).
conclusionAdmissions are chiefly comprised of an ill, elderly population. Careful adherence to guidelines could result in fewer admissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11993587What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.