Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11991643›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2002

Transcript abundance supercedes editing efficiency as a factor in developmental variation of chloroplast gene expression.

Nemo M Peeters, Maureen R Hanson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nemo M PeetersDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-2703, USA.
Maureen R Hanson
Cornell University · US

Funding

NIGMS NIH HHS GM50723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In maize plastids, transcripts are known to be modified at 27 C-to-U RNA editing sites, affecting the expression-of 15 different genes. The relative contribution of editing efficiency versus transcript abundance in regulation of chloroplast gene expression has previously been analyzed for only a few genes. We undertook a comprehensive analysis of the editing efficiency of each of the 27 maize editing sites in 10 different maize tissues, which contain a range of plastid types including chloroplasts, etioplasts, and amyloplasts. Using a reproducible poisoned primer extension assay, we detected variation between RNA editing extent of different sites in the same transcript in the same tissue, and between the same site in different tissues. The most striking editing deficiency is in an editing site in ndhB that is edited at only 8% and 1% in roots and callus plastids respectively, whereas green leaf chloroplasts edit this site at 100%. Editing efficiencies of some sites are not affected by the developmental stages we examined and are always edited close to 80-100%. The relative amounts of transcripts of each of the 10 genes that exhibited variable editing extents were determined by real-time PCR. Seven genes exhibited over 100 times lower transcript abundance in either roots or tissue-cultured cells relative to green leaf tissue. The quantitative analysis indicates that a particular editing site can be efficiently edited over a large range of transcript abundance, resulting in no general correlation of transcript abundance and editing extent. The independent variation of editing efficiency of different sites within the same transcript fits with a model that postulates individual trans-acting factors specific to each editing site. Because tissues where editing efficiency at certain sites is low invariably also exhibited greatly decreased abundance of the transcripts carrying those sites, decrease in the amounts of particular RNAs rather than a lack of editing is predicted to have the most significant impact on gene expression under steady-state conditions. Our data is consistent with the hypothesis that the role of editing in angiosperm plastids is to correct otherwise detrimental mutations rather than to generate significant protein diversity.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantRNA EditingTranscription, GeneticAmino Acid SequenceBase SequenceChloroplastsDNA PrimersGenetic TechniquesGenetic VariationMolecular Sequence DataPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsReproducibility of ResultsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerRNA SplicingDNA PrimersPlant ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID11991643
PMCPMC1370271
OpenAlexW2148470811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.