Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11986387›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2002

Inhibition of the active lymph pump by flow in rat mesenteric lymphatics and thoracic duct.

Anatoliy A Gashev, Michael J Davis, David C Zawieja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 160 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
160citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

160 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pacemaking in the lymphatic system.The Journal of physiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Guidelines for evaluating endothelial function in vascular tissue.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

100 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anatoliy A GashevDepartment of Medical Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute, College of Medicine, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, 336 Reynolds Medical Building, College Station, TX 77843-1114, USA. gashev@tamu.edu
Michael J Davis
David C Zawieja

Funding

Influences of Lymph Flow on the Lymphatic PumpR01HL070308 · NHLBI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI ZAWIEJA, DAVID CARL · 2003 to 2010
$2.4M
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF EDEMAR01HL021498 · NHLBI · TEXAS ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION · PI GRANGER, HARRIS J · 1985 to 2001
$612k
ACTIVATED NEUTROPHILS AND THE EXTRACELLULAR MATRIXF32HL007688 · NHLBI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI ZAWIEJA, DAVID CARL · 1987 to 1988
–
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF EDEMAR37HL021498 · NHLBI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI GRANGER, HARRIS J · 1987 to 1996
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-07688NHLBI NIH HHS HL21498NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL070308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are only a few reports of the influence of imposed flow on an active lymph pump under conditions of controlled intraluminal pressure. Thus, the mechanisms are not clearly defined. Rat mesenteric lymphatics and thoracic ducts were isolated, cannulated and pressurized. Input and output pressures were adjusted to impose various flows. Lymphatic systolic and diastolic diameters were measured and used to determine contraction frequency and pump flow indices. Imposed flow inhibited the active lymph pump in both mesenteric lymphatics and in the thoracic duct. The active pump of the thoracic duct appeared more sensitive to flow than did the active pump of the mesenteric lymphatics. Imposed flow reduced the frequency and amplitude of the contractions and accordingly the active pump flow. Flow-induced inhibition of the active lymph pump followed two temporal patterns. The first pattern was a rapidly developing inhibition of contraction frequency. Upon imposition of flow, the contraction frequency immediately fell and then partially recovered over time during continued flow. This effect was dependent on the magnitude of imposed flow, but did not depend on the direction of flow. The effect also depended upon the rate of change in the direction of flow. The second pattern was a slowly developing reduction of the amplitude of the lymphatic contractions, which increased over time during continued flow. The inhibition of contraction amplitude was dependent on the direction of the imposed flow, but independent of the magnitude of flow. Nitric oxide was partly but not completely responsible for the influence of flow on the mesenteric lymph pump. Exposure to NO mimicked the effects of flow, and inhibition of the NO synthase by N (G)-monomethyl-L-arginine attenuated but did not completely abolish the effects of flow.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood PressureIn Vitro TechniquesKineticsLymphLymphatic SystemLymph NodesMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle, SmoothPressureRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyThoracic DuctNASA Discipline MusculoskeletalNon-NASA Center

Identifiers

PMID11986387
PMCPMC2290276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.