Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11986350›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology2002

Quantitation of intraepithelial lymphocytes in human duodenum: what is normal?

M Hayat, A Cairns, M F Dixon, S O'Mahony

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Microscopic enteritis: Bucharest consensus.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M HayatCentre for Digestive Diseases, General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK. mumtaz@supnet.com
A Cairns
M F Dixon
S O'Mahony

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) is mandatory for the histological diagnosis of coeliac disease (CD). Currently, duodenal biopsies are used almost exclusively to establish the diagnosis, yet published work continues to cite an upper limit of 40 lymphocytes/100 epithelial cells, a figure derived from jejunal biopsies over 30 years ago.

aimTo establish the normal range for IEL counts in distal duodenal biopsies. MATERIALS/

methodsTwenty subjects (seven men, 13 women; median age, 34 years; range, 20-65) with a normal sugar permeability test and concurrent distal duodenal biopsies were identified. The number of IELs and epithelial cell nuclei in an uninterrupted length of surface (villous) epithelium (> 500 cells) was counted. An image analysis system was used to assess villous architecture by calculating the villous height to crypt depth ratio.

resultsThe range of IEL counts in 20 subjects was 1.8-26/100 villous epithelial cells, with a mean value of 11 and SD of 6.8. The mean villous to crypt ratio was 1.82 (SD, 0.38; range, 1.22-2.46). There was no correlation between IEL counts and villous to crypt ratio (Spearman rank correlation, -0.066; p = 0.80).

conclusionsThese results suggest that 25 IELs/100 epithelial cells (mean +2 SD) should be taken as the upper limit of the normal range for duodenal mucosa.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiopsyCeliac DiseaseDuodenumFemaleHumansLymphocyte CountLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedReference Values

Identifiers

PMID11986350
PMCPMC1769642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.