ArticleClinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology2002
Development, evaluation, and application of lateral-flow immunoassay (immunochromatography) for detection of rotavirus in bovine fecal samples.
Article in Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Advances in Lateral Flow Immunoassay for Rapid Diagnosis of Viral Diseases.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Review
- Development and clinical evaluation of a rapid antibody lateral flow assay for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Article
- 2D materials as a diagnostic platform for the detection and sensing of the SARS-CoV-2 virus: a bird's-eye view.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2021Review
- Assessing the Immunochromatographic Test Strip for Serological Detection of Bovine Babesiosis in Uganda.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- A quantum dot-based lateral flow immunoassay for the rapid, quantitative, and sensitive detection of specific IgE for mite allergens in sera from patients with allergic rhinitis.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Rapid and sensitive detection of Yersinia pestis by lateral-flow assay in simulated clinical samples.BMC infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Article
- Reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid detection of Bovine Rotavirus.BMC veterinary research · 2012Article
- Development and application of one-step multiplex reverse transcription PCR for simultaneous detection of five diarrheal viruses in adult cattle.Archives of virology · 2012Article
- Comparison of three diagnostic techniques for detection of rotavirus and coronavirus in calf faeces in Australia.Australian veterinary journal · 2012Article
- A Brief Review on Diagnosis of Foot-and-Mouth Disease of Livestock: Conventional to Molecular Tools.Veterinary medicine international · 2011Article
- Simple and rapid lateral-flow assay for the detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2009Article
- A simple and rapid immunochromatographic test kit for rabies diagnosis.Microbiology and immunology · 2008Article
- Characterization of VP6 genes from rotavirus strains collected in the United States from 1996-2002.Virus genes · 2007Article
- Evaluation of lateral-flow Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin detection kits for food analysis.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A lateral-flow immunoassay (LFT) was developed to detect bovine rotavirus in fecal samples. Using samples (n = 74) from diarrheic calves, a comparison of the LFT with a commercial latex agglutination test (LAT) and transmission electron microscopy (EM) was conducted. When EM was used as the reference method, initial studies of 29 samples indicated 70 and 80% sensitivities of the LFT and LAT, respectively, with both being 100% specific. When the LAT was the reference test, the LFT was 75% sensitive and 91% specific. Additional specimens (n = 45) were tested by the LFT and LAT alone, and results were identical for both methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.