ReviewDrugs2002
Options for induction immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients.
Review in Drugs, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibody induction versus placebo, no induction, or another type of antibody induction for liver transplant recipients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction for liver transplant recipients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- A benefit-risk assessment of basiliximab in renal transplantation.Drug safety · 2004Pooled it
- Evolving concepts in the selection of immunosuppression regimen for liver transplant recipients.Hepatic medicine : evidence and research · 2011Review
- Daclizumab induction therapy in liver transplant recipients with renal insufficiency.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2010Article
- A comprehensive review of immunosuppression used for liver transplantation.Journal of transplantation · 2009Article
- Immunosuppression strategies after liver transplantation: a single centre experience in 57 liver transplant recipients.The Indian journal of surgery · 2007Article
- Role of basiliximab in the prevention of acute cellular rejection in adult to adult living-related liver transplantation: a single center experience.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2007Article
- Barriers preventing liver transplantation in Canadians with HIV-infection--perceptions of HIV specialists.Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie · 2007Article
- Anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies in transplantation: what is the basis for choice?Drugs · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunosuppression administered in the early postoperative period following liver transplantation plays a crucial role in the survival of the graft and the patient. The introduction of cyclosporin was an important landmark in transplantation, and to this day, calcineurin inhibitors form the basis of most induction immunosuppression regimens. New drugs are being developed which are more specifically targeted to prevention of rejection, and multiple drug combinations have been proposed as a means of reducing the adverse effects of individual drugs. Azathioprine and the newer antimetabolite mycophenolate mofetil have been added to calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens with varying amounts of success. Antibody induction has evolved as a potent form of immunosuppression as well as a means of avoiding certain adverse effects, particularly nephrotoxicity. The numerous adverse effects encountered with polyclonal preparations have been reduced with the development of more specific monoclonal antibodies such as muromonab CD3 (OKT3) or interleukin (IL)-2 receptor (IL-2R) antagonists. The anti-IL-2R antibody preparations basiliximab and daclizumab have shown excellent early results due to their potent yet highly targeted immunosuppressive effect and minimal adverse effects. Further study is needed to determine the most appropriate dosage, timing and patient population for these new drugs in the setting of liver transplantation. Although a number of different induction regimens have been described, no single protocol is suitable for all liver transplant recipients. Rather, certain regimens have advantages that could favour their use in a specific subgroup of patients. A number of clinical trials are underway to identify new, more specific drugs and combinations which could be useful in induction immunosuppression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.