Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11976241›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2002

Decision making processes in people with symptoms of acute myocardial infarction: qualitative study.

Jill Pattenden, Ian Watt, Robert J P Lewin, Neil Stanford

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. How do patients with chest pain access Emergency Department care?European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The causes of prehospital delay in myocardial infarction.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jill PattendenDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DQ. jp30@york.ac.uk
Ian Watt
Robert J P Lewin
Neil Stanford

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the themes that influence decision making processes used by patients with symptoms of acute myocardial infarction.

designQualitative study using semistructured interviews.

settingTwo district hospitals in North Yorkshire.

participants22 patients admitted to hospital with confirmed second, third, or fourth acute myocardial infarction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Patients' perceptions of their experience between the onset of symptoms and the decision to seek medical help.

resultsSix main themes that influence the decision making process were identified: appraisal of symptoms, perceived risk, previous experience, psychological and emotional factors, use of the NHS, and context of the event.

conclusionsKnowledge of symptoms may not be enough to promote prompt action in the event of an acute myocardial infarction. Cognitive and emotional processes, individual beliefs and values, and the influence of the context of the event should also be considered in individual interventions designed to reduce delay in the event of symptoms of acute myocardial infarction.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAgedEnglandFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services MisuseHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPatient Acceptance of Health CareRecurrenceRisk AssessmentState MedicineTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID11976241
PMCPMC102775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.