Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11964345›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2002

The rise of regulation in the NHS.

Kieran Walshe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The evolution of quality assurance.Future healthcare journal · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Public accountability and sunshine healthcare regulation.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2011
    Article
  10. Healthcare regulation as a tool for public accountability.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2009
    Article
  11. The rise of independent regulation in health care.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2007
    Article
  12. How safe is the safety paradigm?Quality & safety in health care · 2004
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Trends in doctor-manager relationships.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kieran WalsheUniversity of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. kieran.walshe@man.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Government AgenciesEnglandHumansPoliticsQuality Assurance, Health CareState Medicine

Identifiers

PMID11964345
PMCPMC1122908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.