ReviewLeukemia2002
Large-scale gene expression analysis in molecular target discovery.
Review in Leukemia, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Kernel Based Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction and Classification for Genomic Microarray.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2008Article
- Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe - poly(A)-tail distances.BMC genomics · 2007Article
- DNA array-based gene profiling: from surgical specimen to the molecular portrait of cancer.Annals of surgery · 2005Review
- Cancer stem cell theory: pathologists' considerations and ruminations about wasting time and wrong evaluations.Journal of clinical pathology · 2004Article
- Transcriptional gene expression profiles of HGF/SF-met signaling pathway in colorectal carcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evolution of simple arrays consisting of a few genes to ones composed of thousands of genes and/or ESTs has allowed investigators unprecedented views of the molecular mechanisms within cells. Due to the enormous quantities of information derived from microarray analysis, new types of problems have surfaced, such as where to store all of the data. The ability to solve database or statistical problems has required the bench biologist to collaborate with database developers, software designers and statisticians to determine solutions for storage, analysis and interpretation of microarray data. The collaborative effort between these extremely diverse disciplines has led to the development of creative database query and gene expression analysis tools, producing significant reductions in the time required by researchers to filter through the datasets and discover the key processes perturbed by the diseases of interest. Both unsupervised and supervised analysis methods have been applied to gene expression data leading to the discovery of novel therapeutic targets and diagnostic markers. Furthermore, tumor classification based on their respective molecular fingerprints has led to the classification of cancer subtypes and the discovery of novel molecular taxonomies that may eventually lead to improved patient stratification and superior therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11960324What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.