Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11960291›Full record

ArticleCancer gene therapy2002

Effective gene transfer to solid tumors using different nonviral gene delivery techniques: electroporation, liposomes, and integrin-targeted vector.

Maja Cemazar, Gregor Sersa, John Wilson, Gillian M Tozer, Stephen L Hart, Alenka Grosel, Gabi U Dachs

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer gene therapy, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maja CemazarTumor Microcirculation Group, Gray Cancer Institute, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood HA6 2JR, UK. mcemazar@onko-i.si
Gregor Sersa
John Wilson
Gillian M Tozer
Stephen L Hart
Alenka Grosel
Gabi U Dachs
Mount Vernon Hospital · GBInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana · SIUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we measured transfection efficiency in vitro and in vivo using the following nonviral approaches of gene delivery: injection of plasmid DNA, electroporation-assisted, liposome-enhanced, and integrin-targeted gene delivery, as well as the combination of these methods. Four histologically different tumor models were transfected with a plasmid encoding the green fluorescent protein (GFP) (B16 mouse melanoma, P22 rat carcinosarcoma, SaF mouse sarcoma, and T24 human bladder carcinoma) using adherent cells, dense cell suspensions, and solid tumors. Emphasis was placed on different electroporation conditions to optimise the duration and amplitude of the electric pulses, as well as on different DNA concentrations for effective gene delivery. In addition, transfection efficiency was correlated with cell density of the tumors. The major in vivo findings were: (a) electroporation-assisted gene delivery with plasmid DNA, employing long electric pulses with low amplitude, yielded significantly better GFP expression than short electric pulses with high amplitude; (b) electroporation combined with liposome-DNA complexes yielded the highest percentage of transfected tumor area in B16F1 tumor (6%); (c) transfection efficiency of electroporation-assisted plasmid DNA delivery was dependent on tumor type; (d) integrin-targeted vector, alone or combined with electroporation, was largely ineffective. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that some nonviral methods of gene delivery are feasible and efficient in transfecting solid tumors. Therefore, this makes nonviral methods attractive for further development.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell SurvivalElectroporationGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansIntegrinsLiposomesLuminescent ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred CBAMice, SCIDNecrosisNeoplasms, ExperimentalGreen Fluorescent ProteinsIntegrinsLiposomesLuminescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11960291
OpenAlexW1971555987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.