Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11956223›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of cell biology2002

Simple centromere, complex kinetochore: linking spindle microtubules and centromeric DNA in budding yeast.

Iain M Cheeseman, David G Drubin, Georjana Barnes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of cell biology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Upregulation of CENP-H in tongue cancer correlates with poor prognosis and progression.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2009
    Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iain M CheesemanDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3202, USA.
David G Drubin
Georjana Barnes
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE MICROTUBULE CYTOSKELETONR01GM047842 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BARNES, GEORJANA · 1993 to 2022
$7.5M
SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE MICROTUBULE CYTOSKELETONR55GM047842 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BARNES, GEORJANA · 1992 to 1992
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM47842NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM047842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the budding yeast centromere is extremely short (125 bp) compared to those of other eukaryotes, the kinetochore that assembles on this DNA displays a rich molecular complexity. Here, we describe recent advances in our understanding of kinetochore function in budding yeast and present a model describing the attachment that is formed between spindle microtubules and centromeric DNA. This analysis may provide general principles for kinetochore function and regulation.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalKinetochoresModels, BiologicalSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSaccharomycetalesSpindle ApparatusDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11956223
PMCPMC2199245
OpenAlexW2161566884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.