Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11953325›Full record

ReviewGut2002

Host-pathogen interactions: the seduction of molecular cross talk.

P Sansonetti

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Gastrointestinal dysbiosis and Escherichia coli pathobionts in inflammatory bowel diseases.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2022
    Article
  3. Nutrients · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Microorganisms · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A review on host-pathogen interactions: classification and prediction.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

P SansonettiUnité de Pathogénie Microbienne Moléculaire, INSERM U389, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France. psanson@pasteur.fr
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial pathogens have evolved two major strategies to colonise the intestinal epithelium. Adherent microorganisms bind to the apical pole of the intestinal epithelium, whereas invasive microorganisms disrupt and invade the epithelium. Recognition of the genetic bases of bacterial pathogenicity and analysis of the molecular cross talks established between pathogens and their mammalian target cells have illuminated this diversity of interactions. We have compared the strategies of enteroinvasive pathogens, with emphasis on bacterial species such as Shigella, Yersinia, and Salmonella, that represent paradigms of interaction. Cross talks leading to alteration of the epithelial cell actin cytoskeleton appear as a recurrent theme during entry and dissemination into epithelial cells. Other cross talks alter the trafficking of cellular vesicles and induce changes in the intracellular compartment in which they reside, thus creating niches favourable to bacterial survival and growth. Finally, a variety of strategies also exist to deal with other components of the epithelial barrier, such as macrophages. Pro-phagocytic, anti-phagocytic, and pro-apoptotic processes appear to be of particular importance.

Indexed as

Bacterial TranslocationActinsAnimalsBacterial AdhesionBacterial InfectionsCell MembraneCytoskeletonDendritic CellsEpitheliumIntestinal DiseasesIntestinal MucosaMacrophagesSalmonellaShigellaYersiniaActins

Identifiers

PMID11953325
PMCPMC1867675
OpenAlexW2157756539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.