Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11950963›Full record

ReviewMolecular pathology : MP2002

Haemophilia A and haemophilia B: molecular insights.

D J Bowen

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readCorrected and Republished ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular pathology : MP, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 190 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Factor VIII companion diagnostic for haemophilia.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mutation analysis in the F8 gene in 485 families with haemophilia A and prenatal diagnosis in China.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A new paradigm for personalized prophylaxis for patients with severe haemophilia A.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Mutational Profiles ofMediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

D J BowenDepartment of Haematology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK. bowendj1@cf.ac.uk
University of Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review focuses on selected areas that should interest both the scientist and the clinician alike: polymorphisms within the factor VIII and factor IX genes, their linkage, and their ethnic variation; a general assessment of mutations within both genes and a detailed inspection of the molecular pathology of certain mutations to illustrate the diverse cause-effect relations that exist; a summary of current knowledge on molecular aspects of inhibitor production; and an introduction to the new areas of factor VIII and factor IX catabolism. An appendix defining various terms encountered in the molecular genetics of the haemophilias is included, together with an appendix providing accession numbers and locus identification links for accessing gene and sequence information in the international nucleic acid databases.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticBlood CoagulationChromosome MappingFactor IXFactor VIIIGene DeletionGene RearrangementGenotypeHaplotypesHemophilia AHemophilia BHumansMutation, MissensePoint MutationSequence Analysis, DNAFactor IXFactor VIII

Identifiers

PMID11950963
PMCPMC1187163
OpenAlexW2131473272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.