ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2002
Interaction of vascular smooth muscle cells with collagen-impregnated embolization coils studied with a novel quantitative in vitro model.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modelling biological cell attachment and growth on adherent surfaces.Journal of mathematical biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeModifications of aneurysm occlusion devices and other biologically active molecules may reduce the risk of recanalization by promoting vascular cell migration, adhesion, and proliferation. Our purpose was to apply in vitro methods in the qualitative and quantitative analysis of vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) interactions with collagen-impregnated microcoils.
methodsThe adhesion of rat aortic VSMCs to collagen fiber bundles (CFBs), nitinol coils, and collagen-impregnated nitinol coils (CINCs) was examined by using an assay consisting of monopulse exposure to increasing concentrations of rat aortic VSMCs. Exposed devices were washed and examined by using confocal fluorescence microscopy. Adhesion coefficients, which quantitatively express the cell-binding quality of a surface, were determined by using a mathematical model for cell-device interactions.
resultsVSMCs, attached to devices, spread out and extended cytoplasmic projections over the contact surface. Cell distribution was random on CFBs and within interloop troughs on nitinol coils. On collagen-impregnated coils, VSMCs were selectively concentrated on the collagen between coil loops. The average adhesion coefficient was 25.0 for CFBs, 8.5 for CINCs (250-microm pitch), and 6.5 for nitinol coils. Adhesion coefficient differences for the three devices were significant (P =.044).
conclusionThe monopulse exposure assay is a simple and reproducible in vitro test that provides qualitative information about the morphology and topography of cell-device contacts and permits quantitative measurement of the intrinsic cell-binding quality of the test device. VSMCs exposed to collagen-impregnated microcoils selectively attach to collagen. Collagen enhances the rate of VSMC adhesion to embolic devices, and the degree of enhancement correlates with the surface area constituted by collagen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11950666PMC7975104W1902561211What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.