Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11948409›Full record

ArticleOncogene2002

Positional cloning identifies a novel cyclophilin as a candidate amplified oncogene in 1q21.

Leonardo A Meza-Zepeda, Anne Forus, Birgitte Lygren, Anine B Dahlberg, Linda H Godager, Andrew P South, Ingo Marenholz, Maria Lioumi, Vivi Ann Flørenes, Gunhild M Maelandsmo and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Genomic characteristics of soft tissue sarcomas.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2010
    Review
  12. Article
  13. DNA probe pooling for rapid delineation of chromosomal breakpoints.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2009
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Leonardo A Meza-ZepedaDepartment of Tumour Biology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello N-0310, Oslo, Norway.
Anne Forus
Birgitte Lygren
Anine B Dahlberg
Linda H Godager
Andrew P South
Ingo Marenholz
Maria Lioumi
Vivi Ann Flørenes
Gunhild M Maelandsmo
Massimo Serra
Dietmar Mischke
Dean Nizetic
Jiannis Ragoussis
Maija Tarkkanen
Jahn M Nesland
Sakari Knuutila
Ola Myklebost
Norwegian Cancer Society · NOGuy's Hospital · GBUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Oslo · NOIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gains of 1q21-q23 have been associated with metastasis and chemotherapy response, particularly in bladder cancer, hepatocellular carcinomas and sarcomas. By positional cloning of amplified genes by yeast artificial chromosome-mediated cDNA capture using magnetic beads, we have identified three candidate genes (COAS1, -2 and -3) in the amplified region in sarcomas. COAS1 and -2 showed higher amplification levels than COAS3. Most notably, amplification was very common in osteosarcomas, where in particular COAS2 was highly expressed. COAS1 has multiple repeats and shows no homology to previously described genes, whereas COAS2 is a novel member of the cyclosporin-binding peptidyl-prolyl isomerase family, very similar to cyclophilin A. COAS2 was overexpressed almost exclusively in aggressive metastatic or chemotherapy resistant tumours. Although COAS2 was generally more amplified than COAS1, it was not expressed in well-differentiated liposarcomas, where amplification of this region is very common. All three genes were found to be amplified and over-expressed also in breast carcinomas. The complex nature of the 1q21-23 amplicons and close proximity of the genes make unequivocal determination of the gene responsible difficult. Quite likely, the different genes may give selective advantages to different subsets of tumours.

Indexed as

Gene DosageAmino Acid SequenceChromosomes, Human, Pair 1Cloning, MolecularCyclophilinsGene AmplificationGene Expression ProfilingHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMolecular Sequence DataOncogenesOrgan SpecificityPhysical Chromosome MappingRNA, NeoplasmSequence Homology, Amino AcidTumor Cells, CulturedCyclophilinsRNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID11948409
OpenAlexW2084200513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.