ArticleGene therapy2002
Prime-boost vaccines encoding an intracellular idiotype/GM-CSF fusion protein induce protective cell-mediated immunity in murine pre-B cell leukemia.
Article in Gene therapy, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunization against MUC18/MCAM, a novel antigen that drives melanoma invasion and metastasis.Gene therapy · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two vaccines against an intracellularly expressed B cell idiotype were assessed for their ability to induce protective immunity in mice against challenge with a pre-B cell leukemia. One vaccine was based on a plasmid expression vector and the other was a recombinant vaccinia virus; both vaccines expressed a polypeptide derived from the complementarity-determining regions (CDR(2)-CDR(3)) of the leukemic clone-specific immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH), as a fusion product with mouse granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (mGM-CSF). Mice inoculated with either vaccine showed significantly higher survival rates than controls after challenge with leukemia cells. However, protection from tumor challenge was optimal when the DNA vaccine was used for priming, followed by a booster immunization with the vaccinia virus recombinant. This vaccination protocol induced resistance not only to the first tumor challenge given shortly afterwards, but also to a second challenge given months later. Both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells contributed to protection in vaccinated mice. These data suggest that such a vaccine regimen might reduce the incidence of recurrence in patients with minimal residual disease after conventional therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.