Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11937018›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2002

New drugs for the anorexia-cachexia syndrome.

Mellar P Davis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessment of gastrointestinal function and response to megesterol acetate in subjects with gastrointestinal cancers and weight loss.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2004
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mellar P DavisThe Harry R. Horvitz Center for Palliative Medicine, Taussig Cancer Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, R35, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. davism@ccf.org
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anorexia and cachexia accompany advancing cancer to a greater extent than any other symptom. Cachexia alone causes 22% of cancer deaths. The pathophysiology of cachexia is distinctly different from that of starvation. Resting energy expenditures are elevated, and abnormal intermediary metabolism, proteolysis, and lipolysis occur independently of caloric intake. A facilatative interaction between catecholamines, prostaglandins, and inflammatory cytokines is responsible for cachexia. Successful treatment requires reduction of energy expenditures, reversal of anorexia, and correction of abnormal intermediary metabolism, lipolysis, and proteolysis. Multiple appetite stimulants can be used in combination. Several new potentially useful biologic agents have been tested in animal tumor models. Several of the anticachectic agents have demonstrated in vivo or in vitro antitumor activity. The biologic and clinical activity of each drug is reviewed herein, and potentially useful combinations are listed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnorexiaCachexiaDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID11937018
OpenAlexW1999666098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.