Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11936256›Full record

ArticleMolecular biotechnology2002

A modified nick translation method used with FISH that produces reliable results with archival tissue sections.

Amanda D Watters, Michael W Stacey, John Bartlett

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda D WattersUniversity Dept of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Scotland, UK.
Michael W Stacey
John Bartlett
Glasgow Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nick translation is used to label DNA and RNA to produce probes for in situ hybridization and Northern and Southern blotting. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a widely applied technique used to determine chromosomal and genetic anomalies in many biological samples. Initially the technique was applied to metaphase preparations, but the usefulness of detecting genetic anomalies in solid tumors in situ has resulted in the development of modified protocols. Formalin fixed paraffin processed tissue sections present novel challenges when applying FISH; the probes must be small (between 200 and 600 base pairs) and pretreatment is necessary before the probes can be applied to tissue sections, to promote probe access to target DNA. Here we report on a modification of a nick translation method to produce a probe that can reliably be used with FISH in paraffin processed tissue sections.

Indexed as

Protein BiosynthesisBlotting, NorthernBlotting, SouthernChromosomes, Human, Pair 8CosmidsDeoxyribonuclease IDNAEscherichia coliHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceRNADeoxyribonuclease IDNARNA

Identifiers

PMID11936256
OpenAlexW2008653202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.