Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11932410›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2002

Cell cycle status affects coxsackievirus replication, persistence, and reactivation in vitro.

Ralph Feuer, Ignacio Mena, Robb Pagarigan, Mark K Slifka, J Lindsay Whitton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Anti-viral triterpenes: a review.Phytochemistry reviews : proceedings of the Phytochemical Society of Europe · 2022
    Review
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ralph FeuerDepartment of Neuropharmacology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Ignacio Mena
Robb Pagarigan
Mark K Slifka
J Lindsay Whitton
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

COXSACKIE MYOCARDITIS AND VIRAL PERSISTENCE IN THE HEARTR01AI042314 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WHITTON, J. LINDSAY · 1998 to 2013
$5.6M
COXSACKIEVIRUS 3B PERSISTENCE AND REACTIVATION IN VIVOF32HL010490 · NHLBI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI FEUER, RALPH · 2001 to 2003
$127k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL010490NHLBI NIH HHS HL-10490NIAID NIH HHS AI-42314NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI042314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enteroviral persistence has been implicated in the pathogenesis of several chronic human diseases, including dilated cardiomyopathy, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and chronic inflammatory myopathy. However, these viruses are considered highly cytolytic, and it is unclear what mechanisms might permit their long-term survival. Here, we describe the generation of a recombinant coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) expressing the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP), which we used to mark and track infected cells in vitro. Following exposure of quiescent tissue culture cells to either wild-type CVB3 or eGFP-CVB3, virus production was very limited but increased dramatically after cells were permitted to divide. Studies with cell cycle inhibitors revealed that cells arrested at the G(1) or G(1)/S phase could express high levels of viral polyprotein and produced abundant infectious virus. In contrast, both protein expression and virus yield were markedly reduced in quiescent cells (i.e., cells in G(0)) and in cells blocked at the G(2)/M phase. Following infection with eGFP-CVB3, quiescent cells retained viral RNA for several days in the absence of infectious virus production. Furthermore, RNA extracted from nonproductive quiescent cells was infectious when transfected into dividing cells, indicating that CVB3 appears to be capable of establishing a latent infection in G(0) cells, at least in tissue culture. Finally, wounding of infected quiescent cells resulted in viral protein expression limited to cells in and adjacent to the lesion. We suggest that (i) cell cycle status determines the distribution of CVB3 during acute infection and (ii) the persistence of CVB3 in vivo may rely on infection of quiescent (G(0)) cells incapable of supporting viral replication; a subsequent change in the cell cycle status may lead to virus reactivation, triggering chronic viral and/or immune-mediated pathology in the host.

Indexed as

Virus ActivationVirus ReplicationCell CycleCulture MediaEnterovirus B, HumanGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHeLa CellsHumansLuminescent ProteinsRecombination, GeneticVirus LatencyCulture MediaGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLuminescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11932410
PMCPMC155066
OpenAlexW2099685714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.