ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2002
Strategies for increasing drug delivery to the brain: focus on brain lymphoma.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent updates on central nervous system prophylaxis in patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- MiR-429 Regulated by Endothelial Monocyte Activating Polypeptide-II (EMAP-II) Influences Blood-Tumor Barrier Permeability by Inhibiting the Expressions of ZO-1, Occludin and Claudin-5.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018Article
- Non-caloric sweetener provides magnetic resonance imaging contrast for cancer detection.Journal of translational medicine · 2017Article
- Endocytosis of Nanomedicines: The Case of Glycopeptide Engineered PLGA Nanoparticles.Pharmaceutics · 2015Review
- Veliparib in combination with whole brain radiation therapy in patients with brain metastases: results of a phase 1 study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2015Article
- Implementation of a chronic unilateral intraparenchymal drug delivery system in a swine model.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2014Article
- Article
- Revolutionary impact of nanodrug delivery on neuroscience.Current neuropharmacology · 2012Article
- Mechanisms for endothelial monocyte-activating polypeptide-II-induced opening of the blood-tumor barrier.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2012Article
- Photothermal treatment of glioma; an in vitro study of macrophage-mediated delivery of gold nanoshells.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2011Article
- Increasing of blood-tumor barrier permeability through paracellular pathway by low-frequency ultrasound irradiation in vitro.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2011Article
- Drug interactions at the blood-brain barrier: fact or fantasy?Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2009Review
- Vascular regeneration by local growth factor release is self-limited by microvascular clearance.Circulation · 2009Article
- Disruption of the blood-brain barrier following ALA-mediated photodynamic therapy.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2008Article
- Alkylglycerol opening of the blood-brain barrier to small and large fluorescence markers in normal and C6 glioma-bearing rats and isolated rat brain capillaries.British journal of pharmacology · 2003Article
- Overcoming the blood-brain barrier to taxane delivery for neurodegenerative diseases and brain tumors.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2003Article
- Toxicity of treatment for neoplastic meningitis.Current oncology reports · 2003Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a gate that controls the influx and efflux of a wide variety of substances and consequently restricts the delivery of drugs into the central nervous system (CNS). Brain tumours may disrupt the function of this barrier locally and nonhomogeneously. Therefore, the delivery of drugs to brain tumours has long been a controversial subject. The current concept is that inadequate drug delivery is a major factor that explains the unsatisfactory response of chemosensitive brain tumours. Various strategies have been devised to circumvent the BBB in order to increase drug delivery to the CNS. The various approaches can be categorised as those that attempt to increase delivery of intravascularly administered drugs, and those that attempt to increase delivery by local drug administration. Strategies that increase delivery of intravascularly injected drugs can manipulate either the drugs or the capillary permeability of the various barriers (BBB or blood-tumour barrier), or may attempt to increase plasma concentration or the fraction of the drug reaching the tumour (high-dose chemotherapy, intra-arterial injection). Neurotoxicity is a major concern with increased penetration of drugs into the CNS or when local delivery is practised. Systemic toxicity remains the limiting factor for most methods that use intravascular delivery. This review evaluates the strategies used to increase drug delivery in view of current knowledge of drug pharmacokinetics and its relevance to clinical studies of chemosensitive brain tumours. The main focus is on primary CNS lymphoma, as it is a chemosensitive brain tumour and its management routinely utilises specialised strategies to enhance drug delivery to the affected CNS compartments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11929318What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.