ArticleTransplantation2002
Pediatric liver transplantation. A single center experience spanning 20 years.
Article in Transplantation, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 135 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early Response to Therapeutic Plasma Exchange as a Prognostic Indicator in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients with Early Allograft Dysfunction.Pediatric transplantation · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes of liver transplantation in biliary atresia: a 20-year single-center study.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Acute Neurological Complications After Transplantation in Methylmalonic Acidemia: A 35-Patient French Cohort.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Article
- Immune monitoring and risk of infection in pediatric liver transplantation: a prospective study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Epstein-Barr virus-specific T-cell response in pediatric liver transplant recipients: a cross-sectional study by multiparametric flow cytometry.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- A network-based approach to identify expression modules underlying rejection in pediatric liver transplantation.Cell reports. Medicine · 2022Article
- Targeting Calcineurin Inhibitor-Induced Arterial Hypertension in Liver Transplanted Children Using Hydrochlorothiazide.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2022Article
- Post-operative heparin reduces early venous thrombotic complications after orthotopic paediatric liver transplantation.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2021Article
- Liver transplantation for pediatric inherited metabolic liver diseases.World journal of hepatology · 2021Review
- Biliary-Enteric Drainage vs Primary Liver Transplant as Initial Treatment for Children With Biliary Atresia.JAMA surgery · 2019Article
- Coagulopathy and transfusion therapy in pediatric liver transplantation.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- Long term outcomes of pediatric liver transplantation according to age.Journal of Korean medical science · 2014Article
- Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease in liver transplant patients.Current infectious disease reports · 2011Article
- Transplantation immunology: solid organ and bone marrow.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2010Review
- Proliferative alloresponse of T-cytotoxic cells identifies rejection-prone children with steroid-free liver transplantation.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2009Article
- Allospecific CD154+ T cells associate with rejection risk after pediatric liver transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2009Article
- Genetic variants in major histocompatibility complex-linked genes associate with pediatric liver transplant rejection.Gastroenterology · 2008Article
- [Long-term results after liver transplantation].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2008Review
- Risk factors for rejection and infection in pediatric liver transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2008Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurvival after liver transplantation has improved significantly over the last decade with pediatric recipients faring better than adults. The 20-year experience of pediatric liver transplantation at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh is reported in terms of patient survival; graft survival in relation to age, gender, and immunosuppressive protocols; causes of death; and indications for retransplantation.
methodFrom March 1981 to April 1998, 808 children received liver transplants at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh. All patients were followed until March 2001, with a mean follow-up of 12.2+/-3.9 years (median=12.6; range=2.9-20). There were 405 female (50.2%) and 403 male (49.8%) pediatric recipients. Mean age at transplant was 5.3+/-4.9 years (mean=3.3; range 0.04-17.95), with 285 children (25.3%) being less than 2 years of age at transplant. Cyclosporine (CsA)-based immunosuppression was used before November 1989 in 482 children (50.7%), and the subsequent 326 recipients (40.3%) were treated with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Actuarial survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier statistical method. Differences in survival were calculated by log-rank analysis.
resultsOverall patient survival at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years was 77.1%, 72.6%, 69.4%, 65.8%, and 64.4%, respectively. There was no difference in survival for male or female patients at any time point. At up to 10 years posttransplant, the survival for children greater than 2 years of age (79.5%, 75.7%, and 71.6% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively) was slightly higher than those at less than 2 years of age (72.6%, 66.9%, and 65.3% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively). However, at 15 and 20 years posttransplant, survival rates were similar (>2 years=67.3% and 65.8%; <2 years=64.1% and 64.1%). A significant difference in survival was seen in CsA-based immunosuppression (71.2%, 68.1%, 65.4%, and 61%) versus tacrolimus-based immunosuppression (85.8%, 84.7%, 83.3%, and 82.9%) at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively (P=0.0001). The maximum difference in survival was noted in the first 3 months between CsA and tacrolimus; thus, indicating there may have been other factors (nonimmunological factors) involved in terms of donor and recipient selection and technical issues. The mean annual death rate beyond 2 years posttransplant was 0.47%, with the mean annual death rate for patients who received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression being significantly lower than those who received CsA-based immunosuppression (0.14% vs. 0.8%; P=0.001). The most common etiologies of graft loss were hepatic artery thrombosis (33.4%), acute or chronic rejection (26.6%), and primary nonfunction (16.7%). Of note, retransplantation for graft loss because of acute or chronic rejection occurred only in those patients who received CsA-based immuno-suppression.
conclusionThe overall 20-year actuarial survival for pediatric liver transplantation is 64%. Survival has increased by 20% in the last 12 years with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Although this improvement may be the result of several factors, retransplantation as a result of acute or chronic rejection has been completely eliminated in patients treated with tacrolimus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.