ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2001
Plasma bcl-2 and nitric oxide: possible prognostic role in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gasotransmitters in the tumor microenvironment: Impacts on cancer chemotherapy (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2022Review
- Prognostic value of circulating Bcl-2 and anti-p53 antibodies in patients with breast cancer: A long term follow-up (17.5 years).Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2021Article
- A multi-targeted approach to suppress tumor-promoting inflammation.Seminars in cancer biology · 2015Review
- Apoptosis, angiogenesis, inflammation, and oxidative stress: basic interactions in patients with early and metastatic breast cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2012Article
- Expression patterns and prognostic value of Bag-1 and Bcl-2 in breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interest in translational studies on breast cancer is presently devoted to identifying biological predictors of disease prognosis and response to treatment. In this study, we determined the plasma levels of bcl-2 and nitric oxide in 45 patients with metastatic breast cancer using an ELISA technique and correlated them with clinical and biological factors that may affect the outcome of disease. The results were as follows. The mean level of bcl-2 was 278.44 +/- 383.2 U/L compared with 64.42 +/- 14.4 U/L (p = 0.007) for controls. Levels of bcl-2 were higher in patients less than 50 yr old, premenopausals., GIII tumors, positive nodes, ER positive tumors (p = 0.6, 0.5, 0.9, 0.4, and 0.005, respectively). The site of metastatic disease and the number of metastatic sites did not show statistically significant influences over bcl-2 levels. Furthermore, there was a trend, although not significant, toward improvement of survival in patients with higher levels of bcl-2. The mean level of the nitric oxide (NO) was 297.12 +/- 220.54 microM compared with 13.91 +/- 1.1 microM for controls (p = 0.003). The levels were higher in patients over 50 yr, postmenopausal patients, those with visceral deposits, grade III tumors, positive lymph nodes, and those with disease-free survival of less than 6 mo following primary treatment (p = 0.1, 0.2, 0.1, 0.09, 0.4, and 0.08 respectively). Furthermore, there was no correlation between NO levels and survival (r = 0.002). This study demonstrates a potential role for NO and bcl-2 as prognostic factors in patients with metastatic breast cancer. However, larger studies with more patients together with a comparison of serum levels (ELISA) and tissue levels (MOAb) are still required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11917941What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.