Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11917097›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2002

Molecules, muscles, and machines: universal performance characteristics of motors.

James H Marden, Lee R Allen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Activity affects intraspecific body-size scaling of metabolic rate in ectothermic animals.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2009
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Insect Flight: State of the Field and Future Directions.Integrative and comparative biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Necrobotics: Biotic Materials as Ready-to-Use Actuators.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Maximizing power and velocity of an information engine.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Structural basis for power stroke vs. Brownian ratchet mechanisms of motor proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Light-induced actuating nanotransducers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Allometry of hummingbird lifting performance.The Journal of experimental biology · 2010
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Crystalline molecular machines: encoding supramolecular dynamics into molecular structure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James H MardenDepartment of Biology, 208 Mueller Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. jhm10@psu.edu
Lee R Allen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal- and human-made motors vary widely in size and shape, are constructed of vastly different materials, use different mechanisms, and produce an enormous range of mass-specific power. Despite these differences, there is remarkable consistency in the maximum net force produced by broad classes of animal- and human-made motors. Motors that use force production to accomplish steady translational motion of a load (myosin, kinesin, dynein, and RNA polymerase molecules, muscle cells, whole muscles, winches, linear actuators, and rockets) have maximal force outputs that scale as the two-thirds power of mass, i.e., with cross-sectional area. Motors that use cyclical motion to generate force and are more subject to multiaxial stress and vibration have maximal force outputs that scale as a single isometric function of motor mass with mass-specific net force output averaging 57 N x kg(-1) (SD = 14). Examples of this class of motors includes flying birds, bats, and insects, swimming fish, various taxa of running animals, piston engines, electric motors, and all types of jets. Dependence of force production and stress resistance on cross-sectional area is well known, but the isometric scaling and common upper limit of mass-specific force production by cyclical motion motors has not been recognized previously and is not explained by an existing body of theory. Remarkably, this finding indicates that most of the motors used by humans and animals for transportation have a common upper limit of mass-specific net force output that is independent of materials and mechanisms.

Indexed as

Molecular Motor ProteinsAnimalsHumansMovementMusclesMolecular Motor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11917097
PMCPMC123619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.