ReviewEndocrine pathology2001
Classic and recent special stains used in differential diagnosis of endocrine tumors.
Review in Endocrine pathology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation: an update based on the latest WHO classification.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021Review
- Power Doppler endoscopic ultrasound for the assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Endoscopic ultrasound · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the twentieth century, stains for endocrine cells and tumors were developed from empiric cytologic procedures aimed at modern cytochemical methods. Before the 1970s, endocrine stains were mainly based on silver reaction, although other reactions were also proposed; however, the chemical basis of most of these reactions is still unclear. The development of fluorescence procedures for detecting biogenic amines at the cellular level provided information about endocrine cell function of normal cells and related tumors. However, the application of immunocytochemical reactions brought greater and more definitive insights. Several immunocytochemical markers are now available. Some are specific for a definite cell type, while others detect endocrine differentiation in general. Some of these "pan-endocrine" markers are highly specific, and others are highly sensitive but less specific. They all play a definite role in diagnostic pathology. The use of molecular procedures to detect specific mRNA or genetic mutations of diagnostic interest in endocrine pathology should complement immunophenotyping, especially in some problematic fields, such as that of "poorly differentiated" tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11914471What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.