Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11909785›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2002

Use of ramipril in preventing stroke: double blind randomised trial.

Jackie Bosch, Salim Yusuf, Janice Pogue, Peter Sleight, Eva Lonn, Badrudin Rangoonwala, Richard Davies, Jan Ostergren, Jeff Probstfield, HOPE Investigators. Heart outcomes prevention evaluation

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
27.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 417 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Vascular cognitive impairment: disease mechanisms and therapeutic implications.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2011
    Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. The Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes (SPS3) study.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2011
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Jackie BoschCanadian Cardiovascular Collaboration, McMaster University, 237 Barton St E, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8L 2X2. jackie@ccc.mcmaster.ca
Salim Yusuf
Janice Pogue
Peter Sleight
Eva Lonn
Badrudin Rangoonwala
Richard Davies
Jan Ostergren
Jeff Probstfield
HOPE Investigators. Heart outcomes prevention evaluation
McMaster University · CAJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBKarolinska Institutet · SERhein-Main-Verkehrsverbund · DEUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the effect of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril on the secondary prevention of stroke.

designRandomised controlled trial with 2x2 factorial design.

setting267 hospitals in 19 countries.

participants9297 patients with vascular disease or diabetes plus an additional risk factor, followed for 4.5 years as part of the HOPE study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Stroke (confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging when available), transient ischaemic attack, and cognitive function. Blood pressure was recorded at entry to the study, after 2 years, and at the end of the study.

resultsReduction in blood pressure was modest (3.8 mm Hg systolic and 2.8 mm Hg diastolic). The relative risk of any stroke was reduced by 32% (156 v 226) in the ramipril group compared with the placebo group, and the relative risk of fatal stroke was reduced by 61% (17 v 44). Benefits were consistent across baseline blood pressures, drugs used, and subgroups defined by the presence or absence of previous stroke, coronary artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, diabetes, or hypertension. Significantly fewer patients on ramipril had cognitive or functional impairment.

conclusionRamipril reduces the incidence of stroke in patients at high risk, despite a modest reduction in blood pressure.

Indexed as

AgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCognitionDouble-Blind MethodFollow-Up StudiesHumansIschemic Attack, TransientMiddle AgedRamiprilStrokeAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsRamipril

Identifiers

PMID11909785
PMCPMC99052
OpenAlexW2098876918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.