Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11907220›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2002

Outcome of simian-human immunodeficiency virus strain 89.6p challenge following vaccination of rhesus macaques with human immunodeficiency virus Tat protein.

Peter Silvera, Max W Richardson, Jack Greenhouse, Jake Yalley-Ogunro, Nigel Shaw, Jyotika Mirchandani, Kamel Khalili, Jean-Francois Zagury, Mark G Lewis, Jay Rappaport

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antigen-specific B cell detection reagents: use and quality control.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2008
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter SilveraSouthern Research Institute, Frederick, Maryland. Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Max W Richardson
Jack Greenhouse
Jake Yalley-Ogunro
Nigel Shaw
Jyotika Mirchandani
Kamel Khalili
Jean-Francois Zagury
Mark G Lewis
Jay Rappaport
Southern Research Institute · USTemple University · USSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

TAT AS A VACCINE TARGET IN MACAQUESR21AI047471 · NIAID · TEMPLE UNIVERSITY · PI RAPPAPORT, JAY · 1999 to 2000
$193k
NIAID NIH HHS R21AI47471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The regulatory proteins Nef, Rev, and Tat of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) are attractive targets for vaccine development, since induction of effective immune responses targeting these early proteins may best control virus replication. Here we investigated whether vaccination with biologically active Tat or inactive Tat toxoid derived from HIV-1(IIIB) and simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) strain 89.6p would induce protective immunity in rhesus macaques. Vaccination induced high titers of anti-Tat immunoglobulin G in all immunized animals by week 7, but titers were somewhat lower in the 89.6p Tat group. Dominant B-cell epitopes mapped to the amino terminus, the basic domain, and the carboxy-terminal region. Tat-specific T-helper responses were detected in 50% of immunized animals. T-cell epitopes appeared to map within amino acids (aa) 1 to 24 and aa 37 to 66. In addition, Tat-specific gamma interferon responses were detected in CD4+ and/or CD8+ T lymphocytes in 11 of 16 immunized animals on the day of challenge. However, all animals became infected upon intravenous challenge with 30 50% minimal infective doses of SHIV 89.6p, and there were no significant differences in viral loads or CD4+ T-cell counts between immunized and control animals. Thus, vaccination with HIV-1(IIIB) or SHIV 89.6p Tat or with Tat toxoid preparations failed to confer protection against SHIV 89.6p infection despite robust Tat-specific humoral and cellular immune responses in some animals. Given its apparent immunogenicity, Tat may be more effective as a component of a cocktail vaccine in combination with other regulatory and/or structural proteins of HIV-1.

Indexed as

Macaca mulattaAIDS VaccinesAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntibodies, ViralHIVHIV AntibodiesHIV InfectionsHumansLymphocytesMolecular Sequence DataSimian Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeSimian Immunodeficiency VirusTreatment OutcomeVaccinationAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, ViralHIV Antibodieshuman immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat vaccine

Identifiers

PMID11907220
PMCPMC136117
OpenAlexW2117751118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.