ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2002
Characterization of the human fMLP receptor in neutrophils and in Xenopus oocytes.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human Macrophages Activate Bystander Neutrophils' Metabolism and Effector Functions When Challenged withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Persistent Severe Cerebral Edema with Neutrophil Infiltration Following Listeria Meningitis.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2022Article
- Role of the CXCL8-CXCR1/2 Axis in Cancer and Inflammatory Diseases.Theranostics · 2017Review
- The Role of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in the Formation of Extracellular Traps (ETs) in Humans.Biomolecules · 2015Review
- Regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation in macrophage phagocytosis and chemotaxis.Archives of biochemistry and biophysics · 2011Review
- Identification of an alternative G{alpha}q-dependent chemokine receptor signal transduction pathway in dendritic cells and granulocytes.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. N-formyl peptides (e.g. fMLP; N-formyl-L-methionyl-L-leucyl-phenylalanine) are potent mediators for inflammatory reactions. We report functional expression in Xenopus oocytes of human fMLP-R98 cDNA, without co-expression of the promiscuous G-protein subunit, Galpha-16. 2. Stimulation of voltage-clamped oocytes (-70 mV) with fMLP produced a dose-dependent biphasic inward current with fast and slow components. Analysis using GTP-gamma-S and cholera and pertussis toxins suggested these currents are mediated by an endogenous G-protein of the Gq family. 3. The fast current reversed at -25 mV and was blocked by SITS (4-acetamido-4'-isothiocyanatostilbene-2,2'-disulphonic acid), suggesting the current is carried by Cl(-). The slow current showed weak inward rectification, was Ca(2+)-dependent and blocked by Cd(2+), 4-AP (4-aminopyridine) and haloperidol, suggesting activation of a mixed population of cation channels. 4. Comparative experiments with human neutrophils using flow cytometric analysis showed that the proportion of neutrophils activated by fMLP was reduced in the presence of SITS, in the absence of external calcium and in the presence of Cd(2+), TEA (tetraethylammonium) and haloperidol but not 4-AP. In addition, the oxidative burst from activated neutrophils was reduced by SITS and by the absence of external calcium but not by Cd(2+), TEA, 4-AP or haloperidol. 5. We suggest that in human neutrophils activation by fMLP is dependent on store-operated calcium influx that appears to be regulated by Cl(-) channels and linked, in part, to non-selective cation channels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.