Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11905833›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2001

Transplantation tolerance from a historical perspective.

T E Starzl, R M Zinkernagel

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Liver Inclusion Appears to Be Protective Against Graft Loss-Due-to Chronic But Not Acute Rejection Following Intestinal Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Colliding Epidemics and the Rise of Cryptococcosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
  11. T Cells: Soldiers and Spies--The Surveillance and Control of Effector T Cells by Regulatory T Cells.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. The concept of gut rehabilitation and the future of visceral transplantation.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Molecular diagnostics in transplantation.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T E StarzlTransplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania 15213, USA. starzlte@msx.upmc.edu
R M Zinkernagel

Funding

ORTHOTOPIC LIVER TRANSPLANTATIONR01DK029961 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STARZL, THOMAS E · 1986 to 2001
$876k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK029961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although transplantation immunology as a distinctive field began with the development of experimental models that showed the feasibility of bone marrow transplantation, organ engraftment was accomplished first in humans, and was thought for many years to occur by drastically different mechanisms. Here, we present our view of the concepts of allograft acceptance and acquired tolerance from a historical perspective, and attempt to amalgamate them into simple and unifying rules that might guide improvements in clinical therapy.

Indexed as

Transplantation ImmunologyAnimalsBone Marrow TransplantationChimeraClonal DeletionGraft RejectionHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHumansImmune ToleranceModels, Immunological

Identifiers

PMID11905833
PMCPMC3228352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.