Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11904439›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2002

The identification of E2F1-specific target genes.

Julie Wells, Carrie R Graveel, Stephanie M Bartley, Steven J Madore, Peggy J Farnham

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Arborinine fromFood & nutrition research · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie WellsMcArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, WI 53706; and Genomics and Bioinformatics, Pfizer Inc., Ann Arbor, MI 48105.
Carrie R Graveel
Stephanie M Bartley
Steven J Madore
Peggy J Farnham
Pfizer (United States) · US

Funding

BIOTECHNOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008349 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FOX, BRIAN G · 1989 to 2019
$22.5M
TRANSGENIC MODELS OF DIOXIN CARCINOGENICITY AND AH RECEPTOR FUNCTIONP01CA022484 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BRADFIELD, CHRISTOPHER A · 1985 to 2011
$9.2M
STOREROOM AND MATERIALS ACQUISITION LABORATORYP30CA007175 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI DRINKWATER, NORMAN R. · 1985 to 2000
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA07175NCI NIH HHS CA22484NCI NIH HHS P01 CA022484NIGMS NIH HHS GM08349NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The E2F family of transcriptional regulators consists of six different members. Analysis of E2F-regulated promoters by using cultured cells suggests that E2Fs may have redundant functions. However, animal studies have shown that loss of individual E2Fs can have distinct biological consequences. Such seemingly conflicting results could be due to a difference in E2F-mediated regulation in cell culture vs. animals. Alternatively, there may be genes that are specifically regulated by an individual E2F which have not yet been identified. To investigate this possibility further, we have analyzed gene expression in E2F1 nullizygous mice. We found that loss of E2F1 did not cause changes in expression of known E2F target genes, suggesting that perhaps E2F1-specific promoters are distinct from known E2F target promoters. Therefore, we used oligonucleotide microarrays to identify mRNAs whose expression is altered on loss of E2F1. We demonstrate by chromatin immunoprecipitation that several of the promoters that drive expression of the deregulated mRNAs selectively recruit E2F1, but not other E2Fs, and this recruitment is via an element distinct from a consensus E2F binding site. To our knowledge, these are as yet undocumented examples of promoters being occupied in asynchronously growing cells by a single E2F family member. Interestingly, the E2F1-specific target genes that we identified encode proteins having functions quite different from the function of known E2F target genes. Thus, whereas E2F1 may share redundant functions in cell growth control with other E2F family members, it may also play an important biological role distinct from the other E2Fs.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationAnimalsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsE2F1 Transcription FactorE2F Transcription FactorsGene DeletionKidneyLiverMaleMiceMice, Inbred StrainsOrgan SpecificityPrecipitin TestsCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsE2f1 protein, mouseE2F1 Transcription FactorE2F Transcription FactorsRNA, MessengerTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID11904439
PMCPMC122619
OpenAlexW1998280728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.