ArticleGenetics2002
Crossover interference in the mouse.
Article in Genetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex differences in crossover interference in house mice.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Sex differences in crossover interference in house mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Crossover frequencies in spermatocytes of Robertsonian homozygotes and heterozygotes of Mus musculus domesticus.Genetics and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Genetic background affects the strength of crossover interference in house mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Evolutionary Analyses of Gene Expression Divergence in Panicum hallii: Exploring Constitutive and Plastic Responses Using Reciprocal Transplants.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- PLK1 depletion alters homologous recombination and synaptonemal complex disassembly events during mammalian spermatogenesis.Molecular biology of the cell · 2022Article
- Meiotic, genomic and evolutionary properties of crossover distribution in Drosophila yakuba.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Meiotic Crossover Patterning.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Genetic architecture of individual variation in recombination rate on the X chromosome in cattle.Heredity · 2020Article
- A novel function for CDK2 activity at meiotic crossover sites.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- Sexual dimorphism in the meiotic requirement for PRDM9: A mammalian evolutionary safeguard.Science advances · 2020Article
- Cyclin N-Terminal Domain-Containing-1 Coordinates Meiotic Crossover Formation with Cell-Cycle Progression in a Cyclin-Independent Manner.Cell reports · 2020Article
- Examining the Effects of Temperature on Recombination in Wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Article
- A segregating human allele of SPO11 modeled in mice disrupts timing and amounts of meiotic recombination, causing oligospermia and a decreased ovarian reserve†.Biology of reproduction · 2019Article
- A first genetic portrait of synaptonemal complex variation.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
- Substantial Heritable Variation in Recombination Rate on Multiple Scales in Honeybees and Bumblebees.Genetics · 2019Article
- The Genomic Landscape of Crossover Interference in the Desert TreeFrontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Genetic mapping of molar size relations identifies inhibitory locus for third molars in mice.Heredity · 2018Article
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present an analysis of crossover interference in the mouse genome, on the basis of high-density genotype data from two reciprocal interspecific backcrosses, comprising 188 meioses. Overwhelming evidence was found for strong positive crossover interference with average strength greater than that implied by the Carter-Falconer map function. There was some evidence for interchromosomal variation in the level of interference, with smaller chromosomes exhibiting stronger interference. We further compared the observed numbers of crossovers to previous cytological observations on the numbers of chiasmata and evaluated evidence for the obligate chiasma hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.