Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11900684›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2002

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: is there a role for medical therapy?

Alexander Craig, James Toouli

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The sphincter of oddi.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2007
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander CraigGastrointestinal Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia. sandy.craig@flinders.edu.au
James Toouli
Flinders Medical Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If the mechanism of pain in patients with sphincter of Oddi (SO) dysfunction is functional obstruction of the biliary tract, and at least in some patients it results from sphincter smooth muscle hypertrophy, then smooth muscle relaxants should have a theoretic role in the management of these patients. Calcium channel antagonists and other smooth muscle relaxants have been shown in "acute" manometric studies to alter SO motility. However, the effect of these agents on vascular smooth muscle remains a concern and often limits their use. At present the role of medical therapy is somewhat unclear because few well-conducted studies have used manometric criteria for the diagnosis of SO dysfunction and the selection of patients for therapy. The main drawback is that no drugs appear to be specific for the SO, long acting, and free of side effects.

Indexed as

AnimalsBotulinum ToxinsCalcium Channel BlockersCommon Bile Duct DiseasesHumansNarcotic AntagonistsNifedipineParasympatholyticsSphincter of OddiSympatholyticsVasodilator AgentsBotulinum ToxinsCalcium Channel BlockersNarcotic AntagonistsNifedipineParasympatholyticsSympatholyticsVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID11900684
OpenAlexW2030117414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.