Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11898529›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2001

Infection and the etiology and pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis.

I Steiner, P Nisipianu, I Wirguin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Astrocyte Activation and Drug Target in Pathophysiology of Multiple Sclerosis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Human endogenous retroviruses and the nervous system.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2014
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Chlamydophila pneumoniae Infection and Its Role in Neurological Disorders.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2010
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

I SteinerDepartment of Neurology, Hadassah University Hospital, PO Box 12000, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
P Nisipianu
I Wirguin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) currently defies clinical and scientific definitions, and carries a prognosis that remains practically unchanged despite many years of intensive research. Although the prevailing dogma is that MS is an immune-mediated condition, it fulfills none of the criteria of an autoimmune disease. On the other hand, there is enough significant data to suggest that infectious agents(s) could be involved in either direct damage to the white matter or induce inflammatory responses that secondarily affect the brain. Our goal here is to review the data supporting the possibility that infection has a critical role in the disease, examine the list of potential candidates that have been suggested, and outline an approach regarding the potential role of infectious agents in the etiology and pathogenesis of MS.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsAutoantigensAutoimmune DiseasesBrainChildChlamydophila InfectionsChlamydophila pneumoniaeCluster AnalysisEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsHerpesvirus 6, HumanHumansImmunologic FactorsInfectionsInterferon-betaLymphocyte ActivationAutoantigensImmunologic FactorsInterferon-beta

Identifiers

PMID11898529
PMCPMC7089122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.