Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11898508›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2001

Acute treatment of migraine and the role of triptans.

F G Freitag

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

F G FreitagDiamond Headache Clinic, 467 W. Deming Place, Suite 500, Chicago, IL 60614, USA. dhcdoc@aol.com
Diamond Headache Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of triptans has improved the ability to treat migraine successfully compared with older treatments. Speed of relief, consistency of effect, and good tolerability have been the hallmarks of these agents. All of the currently available triptans have comparable efficacy and tolerability. Variables between the agents may lead to one agent or dose form being preferred over another in various clinical scenarios. The triptans that are forthcoming may improve on these options through enhanced efficacy rates, tolerability, and headache recurrence rates. There exist increasing options for migraine treatment that may further improve the clinical effects of the older and newer triptans through early treatment of migraine at the stages of mild migraine pain, or even during the prodromal phase of the attack. Additionally, recent work suggests that mini-prophylaxis of migraine at the menses is a highly successful treatment option with the triptans. In this age of managed care, providing cost-effective treatment of headache will take on increasing importance. Techniques such as stratification of acute treatments may enhance cost-effective care, whereas ready availability of the triptans may lead to significant improvements in utilization of parameters such as office visits, emergency room treatment, and even hospitalization.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseBlood Flow VelocityCarbazolesClinical Trials as TopicDrug Administration RoutesFemaleHumansIndolesMaleMenstruationMigraine DisordersOxazolidinonesPiperidinesPractice Guidelines as TopicPyrrolidinesReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1BalmotriptanCarbazoleseletriptanfrovatriptanHTR1B protein, humanIndolesnaratriptanOxazolidinonesPiperidinesPyrrolidinesReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1BReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1DReceptors, SerotoninrizatriptanSerotonin Receptor AgonistsSumatriptanTriazolesTryptaminesVasoconstrictor Agentszolmitriptan

Identifiers

PMID11898508
OpenAlexW2066298502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.