Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11897584›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2002

In vitro and in vivo activities of gatifloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Enrique J Alvirez-Freites, Janna L Carter, Michael H Cynamon

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Investigational antimicrobial agents of 2013.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2013
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. New anti-tuberculosis agents amongst known drugs.Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2009
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Treatment Options for HIV-Associated Tuberculosis.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2007
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Enrique J Alvirez-FreitesDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Upstate Medical University, State University of New York, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Janna L Carter
Michael H Cynamon
SUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS U19-AI40974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gatifloxacin (GAT) and moxifloxacin (MXF) were evaluated in vitro to determine their activities against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. GAT was subsequently compared in a dose range study to isoniazid (INH) in a murine tuberculosis model. GAT was somewhat less active than INH. GAT and MXF were evaluated in mice infected with M. tuberculosis and were found to have similar activities. GAT was studied alone and in combination with ethambutol, ethionamide (ETA), and pyrazinamide (PZA) and compared to INH and rifampin (RIF). GAT appears to have sufficient activity alone and in combination with ETA with or without PZA to merit evaluation for treatment of tuberculosis.

Indexed as

Aza CompoundsFluoroquinolonesQuinolinesAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsAntitubercular AgentsColony Count, MicrobialDrug CombinationsFemaleGatifloxacinHumansIsoniazidMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMoxifloxacinAnti-Infective AgentsAntitubercular AgentsAza CompoundsDrug CombinationsFluoroquinolonesGatifloxacinIsoniazidMoxifloxacinQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID11897584
PMCPMC127120
OpenAlexW2142363904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.