ArticleOncogene2002
Mutational analysis of the transcriptional activation domains of v-Myb.
Article in Oncogene, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analyzing the Diversity of MYB Family Response Strategies to Drought Stress in Different Flax Varieties Based on Transcriptome Data.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Situational awareness: regulation of the myb transcription factor in differentiation, the cell cycle and oncogenesis.Cancers · 2014Review
- A small ubiquitin-related modifier-interacting motif functions as the transcriptional activation domain of Krüppel-like factor 4.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2010Article
- Positive and negative regulation of c-Myb by cyclin D1, cyclin-dependent kinases, and p27 Kip1.Blood · 2005Article
- Sequence elements necessary for transcriptional activation of BAD1 in the yeast phase of Blastomyces dermatitidis.Eukaryotic cell · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A minimal transcription activation domain of the v-Myb oncoprotein was initially mapped to a central cluster of charged residues using GAL4-Myb fusion proteins. This region has been proposed to interact directly with the CBP co-activator in animal cells. Regions flanking this central domain of v-Myb are required for transcriptional activation by the native, unfused protein in both mammalian cells and in budding yeast. To identify the critical residues for transcriptional activation, we have now subjected the minimal activation domain and flanking regions including the heptad leucine repeat to random PCR-mediated mutagenesis. We found that the entire region examined can endure extensive substitutions without affecting transcriptional activation by v-Myb in budding yeast. The few mutations that did affect transcriptional activation altered acidic residues within the minimal activation domain or the heptad leucine repeat region, rather than leucine residues. Remarkably, there was a strong concordance between transcriptional activation in animal cells and in budding yeast, even though budding yeast have no known homologue of CBP or related co-activators. In contrast, there was not a strong correlation between transcriptional activation and oncogenic transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.