Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11896065›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical pathology2002

Hodgkin's lymphoma: the pathologist's viewpoint.

S A Pileri, S Ascani, L Leoncini, E Sabattini, P L Zinzani, P P Piccaluga, A Pileri, M Giunti, B Falini, G B Bolis and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical pathology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Hodgkin's lymphoma.BMJ clinical evidence · 2009
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Obesity and Risk for Lymphoma: Possible Role of Leptin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The role of immunohistochemistry in the assessment of classical Hodgkin lymphoma microenvironment.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2022
    Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

S A PileriPathologic Anatomy and Haematopathology, Bologna University, Policlinico S. Orsola, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy. pileri@almadns.unibo.it
S Ascani
L Leoncini
E Sabattini
P L Zinzani
P P Piccaluga
A Pileri
M Giunti
B Falini
G B Bolis
H Stein

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite its well known histological and clinical features, Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) has recently been the object of intense research activity, leading to a better understanding of its phenotype, molecular characteristics, histogenesis, and possible mechanisms of lymphomagenesis. There is complete consensus on the B cell derivation of the tumour in most cases, and on the relevance of Epstein-Barr virus infection and defective cytokinesis in at least a proportion of patients. The REAL/WHO classification recognises a basic distinction between lymphocyte predominance HL (LP-HL) and classic HL (CHL), reflecting the differences in clinical presentation and behaviour, morphology, phenotype, and molecular features. CHL has been classified into four subtypes: lymphocyte rich, nodular sclerosing, with mixed cellularity, and lymphocyte depleted. The borders between CHL and anaplastic large cell lymphoma have become sharper, whereas those between LP-HL and T cell rich B cell lymphoma remain ill defined. Treatments adjusted to the pathobiological characteristics of the tumour in at risk patients have been proposed and are on the way to being applied.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, DifferentialGenotypeHodgkin DiseaseHumansLymphoma, Non-HodgkinPhenotypeSclerosis

Identifiers

PMID11896065
PMCPMC1769601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.