Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11895822›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2002

Use of evidence based leaflets to promote informed choice in maternity care: randomised controlled trial in everyday practice.

A O'Cathain, S J Walters, J P Nicholl, K J Thomas, M Kirkham

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. A systematic review of information in decision aids.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2007
    Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A O'CathainSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield S1 4DA. a.ocathain@sheffield.ac.uk
S J Walters
J P Nicholl
K J Thomas
M Kirkham

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effect of leaflets on promoting informed choice in women using maternity services.

designCluster trial, with maternity units randomised to use leaflets (intervention units) or offer usual care (control units). Data collected through postal questionnaires.

setting13 maternity units in Wales.

participantsFour separate samples of women using maternity services. Antenatal samples: women reaching 28 weeks' gestation before (n=1386) and after (n=1778) the intervention. Postnatal samples: women at eight weeks after delivery before (n=1741) and after (n=1547) the intervention.

interventionProvision of 10 pairs of Informed Choice leaflets for service users and midwives and a training session for staff in their use.

main outcome measuresChange in the proportion of women who reported exercising informed choice. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: changes in women's knowledge; satisfaction with information, choice, and discussion; and possible consequences of informed choice.

resultsThere was no change in the proportion of women who reported that they exercised informed choice in the intervention units compared with the control units for either antenatal or postnatal women. There was a small increase in satisfaction with information in the antenatal samples in the intervention units compared with the control units (odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.88). Only three quarters of women in the intervention units reported being given at least one of the leaflets, indicating problems with the implementation of the intervention.

conclusionIn everyday practice, evidence based leaflets were not effective in promoting informed choice in women using maternity services.

Indexed as

PamphletsPregnant PeopleAttitude to HealthChoice BehaviorEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInformed ConsentPatient Education as TopicPregnancyPrenatal CarePrognosisWalesEmpirical ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

Identifiers

PMID11895822
PMCPMC84396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.