Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11895821›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2002

Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care.

Helen Stapleton, Mavis Kirkham, Gwenan Thomas

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. A systematic review of decision support needs of parents making child health decisions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2008
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Information for pregnant women about caesarean birth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004
    Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Decision aids for patients with carotid stenosis.Journal of vascular surgery · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Helen StapletonWomen's Informed Childbearing and Health Research Group, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7ND. h.stapleton@sheffield.ac.uk
Mavis Kirkham
Gwenan Thomas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the use of evidence based leaflets on informed choice in maternity services.

designNon-participant observation of 886 antenatal consultations. 383 in depth interviews with women using maternity services and health professionals providing antenatal care.

settingWomen's homes; antenatal and ultrasound clinics in 13 maternity units in Wales.

participantsChildbearing women and health professionals who provide antenatal care.

interventionProvision of 10 pairs of Informed Choice leaflets for service users and staff and a training session in their use.

main outcome measuresParticipants' views and commonly observed responses during consultations and interviews.

resultsHealth professionals were positive about the leaflets and their potential to assist women in making informed choices, but competing demands within the clinical environment undermined their effective use. Time pressures limited discussion, and choice was often not available in practice. A widespread belief that technological intervention would be viewed positively in the event of litigation reinforced notions of "right" and "wrong" choices rather than "informed" choices. Hierarchical power structures resulted in obstetricians defining the norms of clinical practice and hence which choices were possible. Women's trust in health professionals ensured their compliance with professionally defined choices, and only rarely were they observed asking questions or making alternative requests. Midwives rarely discussed the contents of the leaflets or distinguished them from other literature related to pregnancy. The visibility and potential of the leaflets as evidence based decision aids was thus greatly reduced.

conclusionsThe way in which the leaflets were disseminated affected promotion of informed choice in maternity care. The culture into which the leaflets were introduced supported existing normative patterns of care and this ensured informed compliance rather than informed choice.

Indexed as

PamphletsPregnant PeopleAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthChoice BehaviorDecision Making, OrganizationalEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansInformed ConsentInterprofessional RelationsMedical Laboratory SciencePatient Education as TopicPregnancyPrenatal CareEmpirical ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

Identifiers

PMID11895821
PMCPMC84395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.