Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11889030›Full record

ReviewThe EMBO journal2002

Yeast vacuoles and membrane fusion pathways.

William Wickner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The EMBO journal, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bioengineered yeast-derived vacuoles with enhanced tissue-penetrating ability for targeted cancer therapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. In vitro assay using engineered yeast vacuoles for neuronal SNARE-mediated membrane fusion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A lipid-anchored SNARE supports membrane fusion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Analysis of a novel calcium auxotrophy in Aspergillus nidulans.Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B · 2010
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

William WicknerDepartment of Biochemistry, Dartmouth Medical School, 7200 Vail Building, Hanover, NH 03755-3844, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective membrane fusion underlies subcellular compartmentation, cell growth, neurotransmission and hormone secretion. Its fundamental mechanisms are conserved among organelles, tissues and organisms. As befits a conserved process, reductionism led to its study in microorganisms. Homotypic fusion of the vacuole of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is particularly accessible to study as vacuoles are readily visualized, there is a rapid and quantitative in vitro assay of vacuole fusion, and the genetics and genomics of this organism and of vacuole fusion are highly advanced. Recent progress is reviewed in the context of general questions in the membrane fusion field.

Indexed as

Intracellular MembranesMembrane FusionSaccharomyces cerevisiaeVacuoles

Identifiers

PMID11889030
PMCPMC125920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.