Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11885980›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2002

Structure refinement of flexible proteins using dipolar couplings: application to the protein p8MTCP1.

Hélène Déméné, Thierry Ducat, Philippe Barthe, Marc-André Delsuc, Christian Roumestand

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hélène DéménéCentre de Biochimie Structurale, UMR 5048 CNRS-UM1/UMR 554 INSERM-UMI, Montpellier, France. helene@cbs.univ-montp1.fr
Thierry Ducat
Philippe Barthe
Marc-André Delsuc
Christian Roumestand

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study deals with the relevance of using mobility-averaged dipolar couplings for the structure refinement of flexible proteins. The 68-residue protein p8MTCP1 has been chosen as model for this study. Its solution state consists mainly of three alpha-helices. The two N-terminal helices are strapped in a well-determined alpha-hairpin, whereas, due to an intrinsic mobility, the position of the third helix is less well defined in the NMR structure. To further characterize the degrees of freedom of this helix, we have measured the dipolar coupling constants in the backbone of p8MTCP1 in a bicellar medium. We show here that including D(dip)HN dipolar couplings in the structure calculation protocol improves the structure of the alpha-hairpin but not the positioning of the third helix. This is due to the motional averaging of the dipolar couplings measured in the last helix. Performing two calculations with different force constants for the dipolar restraints highlights the inconstancy of these mobility-averaged dipolar couplings. Alternatively, prior to any structure calculations, comparing the values of the dipolar couplings measured in helix III to values back-calculated from an ideal helix demonstrates that they are atypical for a helix. This can be partly attributed to mobility effects since the inclusion of the 15N relaxation derived order parameter allows for a better fit.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnisotropyMagneticsMiceModels, MolecularMotionNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein ConformationProtein Structure, SecondaryProto-Oncogene ProteinsMTCP1 protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.