Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11885825›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2002

A combination of systematic review and clinicians' beliefs in interventions for subacromial pain.

Kajsa Johansson, Birgitta Oberg, Lars Adolfsson, Mats Foldevi

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03752619 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation(PNS) for Subacromial Impingement Syndrome(SIS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMetroHealth Medical CenterRan2019 to 2024Enrolled116ConditionsShoulder Pain, Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Shoulder Tendinitis, Shoulder BursitisArmsContracting Producing Peripheral Nerve Stimulation, Non Contracting Producing Peripheral Nerve Stimulation, Physical Therapy
NCT04128605 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Suprascapular Nerve Block Versus Intraarticular Steroid Injection in Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Double Blinded Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MalayaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled86ConditionsHemiplegic Shoulder PainArmsSuprascapular nerve block (SSNB), Intraarticular shoulder steroid injection (IAS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Communication breakdown: clinicians disagree on subacromial impingement.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kajsa JohanssonDepartment of Medicine and Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping, Sweden. Kajsa.Johansson@hul.liu.se
Birgitta Oberg
Lars Adolfsson
Mats Foldevi
Linköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study is to determine which treatments for patients with subacromial pain are trusted by general practitioners (GPs) and physiotherapists, and to compare trusted treatments with evidence from a systematic critical review of the scientific literature. A two-step process was used: a questionnaire (written case simulation) and a systematic critical review. The questionnaire was mailed to 188 GPs and 71 physiotherapists in Sweden. The total response rate was 72% (186/259). The following treatments were trusted, ergonomics/adjustments at work, corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, movement exercises, acupuncture, ultrasound therapy, strengthening exercises, stretching, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation, and superficial heat or ice therapy. The review, including efficacy studies for the treatments found to be trusted, was conducted using the CINAHL, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases. Evidence for efficacy was recorded in relation to methodological quality and to diagnostic criteria that labelled participants as having subacromial pain or a non-specific shoulder disorder. Forty studies were included. The methodological quality varied and only one treatment had definitive evidence for efficacy for non-specific patients, namely injection of corticosteroids. The trust in corticosteroids, injected in the subacromial bursa, was supported by definitive evidence for short-term efficacy. Acupuncture had tentative evidence for short-term efficacy in patients with subacromial pain. Ultrasound therapy was ineffective for subacromial pain. This is supported by tentative evidence and, together with earlier reviews, this questions both the trust in the treatment and its use. The clinicians' trust in treatments had a weak association with available scientific evidence.

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAttitude of Health PersonnelExercise TherapyFamily PracticeHumansPain ManagementReview Literature as TopicShoulder Impingement SyndromeShoulder PainSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenUltrasonographyAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal

Identifiers

PMID11885825
PMCPMC1314222
OpenAlexW2112360751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.