Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11885415›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2002

Exploiting plant metabolism for the phytoremediation of persistent herbicides.

Julian O D Coleman, Carla Frova, Peter Schroder, Michel Tissut

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Using phytoremediation technologies to upgrade waste water treatment in Europe.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2007
    Article
  5. Environmental impact of aquaculture and countermeasures to aquaculture pollution in China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2007
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julian O D ColemanSchool of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK.
Carla Frova
Peter Schroder
Michel Tissut

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weed control by herbicides has helped us to create the green revolution and to provide food for at least the majority of human beings living today. However, some herbicides remain in the environment and pose an ecological problem. The present review describes the properties and fate of four representative herbicides known to be presistent in ecosystems. Metabolic networks are depicted and it is concluded that removal of these compounds by the ecologically friendly technique of phytoremediation is possible. The largest problem is seen in the uptake of the compounds into suitable plants and the time needed for such an approach.

Indexed as

Phenylurea Compounds2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic AcidAcetamidesAtrazineBiodegradation, EnvironmentalEcologyHerbicidesMethylurea CompoundsPlantsSoil Pollutants2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic AcidAcetamidesAtrazineHerbicidesisoproturonMethylurea CompoundsmetolachlorPhenylurea CompoundsSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID11885415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.