Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11884325›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2002

Enhancing public safety in primary care.

Tim Wilson, Aziz Sheikh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Patient Safety and the Question of Dignitary Harms.The Journal of medicine and philosophy · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Impact of Design on Medical Device Safety.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2020
    Review
  7. High-risk medication in community care: a scoping review.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The über-GP: an exploration of clinical excellence, leadership, and patient-centred care in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The challenge of improving patient safety in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tim Wilsona RCGP Quality Unit, 14 Princes Gate, London SW7 1PU. twilson@rcgp.org.uk
Aziz Sheikh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CommunicationDiagnostic ErrorsHumansIatrogenic DiseaseMedication ErrorsPrimary Health CareSafety Management

Identifiers

PMID11884325
PMCPMC78998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.