Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11882477›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2002

The relationship between lead in plasma and whole blood in women.

Donald Smith, Mauricio Hernandez-Avila, Martha Maria Téllez-Rojo, Adriana Mercado, Howard Hu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reliability of low mass toenail samples as biomarkers of chronic metal exposure.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Combined Effect of Lead Exposure and Allostatic Load on Cardiovascular Disease Mortality-A Preliminary Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donald SmithEnvironmental Toxicology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95604, USA. smith@etox.ucsc.edu
Mauricio Hernandez-Avila
Martha Maria Téllez-Rojo
Adriana Mercado
Howard Hu
University of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES000002 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI SUSAN A KORRICK · 1985 to 2026
$44.6M
VANADIUM AND HUMAN HEALTHP42ES005947 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI KELSEY, KARL TIMOTHY · 1992 to 2006
$19.6M
LEAD DOSE BIOMARKERS, REPRODUCTION, AND INFANT OUTCOMESR01ES007821 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PETERSON, KAREN EILEEN · 1998 to 2010
$4.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS 2P30 ES 00002NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES 05947NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES 07821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies have suggested that plasma lead levels may better reflect the toxicologically labile fraction of circulatory Pb that is more freely available for exchange with target tissues than do Pb levels in whole blood. Studies have also reported an apparent severalfold variation in the relative partitioning of Pb between whole blood and plasma (or serum) for a given whole-blood Pb level. This may reflect inherent differences in the plasma Pb/whole blood Pb partitioning among individuals and/or methodologic challenges associated with the collection and analyses of samples that generally contain < 1-2 ng total Pb. Here, we conducted a longitudinal assessment of the relationship between Pb in whole blood and plasma in environmentally exposed reproductive-age women (n = 63) living in Mexico City, Mexico. We collected whole blood and plasma samples using trace metal clean techniques and analyzed them for Pb using high-resolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. A subset of subjects provided repeated blood samples weekly for 4 consecutive weeks (n = 17 subjects) or every 1-2 months over a 9-month period (n = 14 subjects). Plasma Pb concentration was significantly positively associated with whole-blood Pb in a curvilinear fashion over the range of blood Pb values observed here (2.13-39.7 microg/dL). This relationship was best described by the function Plasma Pb = e (-2.392 + 0.0898 x blood Pb), where SE(coefficient) = 0.0054, SE(constant) = 0.063 (n = 63 subjects, n = 141 observations). Results from the short- and long-term repeated collection subjects indicated that the within- and between-subject variance components were not significantly different between the two subsets of subjects. The between-subjects component accounts for 78% of the variance in plasma Pb levels, while the residual variance (22%) may be attributed to other unmeasured factors. Collectively, this study demonstrates that plasma Pb measurements may be applied to general clinical settings, provided that established trace metal clean techniques are adopted. This study also shows that the relative (%) partitioning of whole-blood Pb in plasma naturally varies by a factor of about 2-4-fold among subjects at a given blood Pb level. Because Pb in the plasma is considered to more closely represent the fraction of Pb in the circulation that is readily exchanged with peripheral target tissues (e.g., brain, kidney, skeleton), the routine assessment of plasma Pb may provide a more meaningful measure of toxicologically available Pb.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureAdultBiological AvailabilityFemaleHumansLeadLongitudinal StudiesPlasmaSensitivity and SpecificityLead

Identifiers

PMID11882477
PMCPMC1240766
OpenAlexW1977959660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.