Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11874837›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2002

Which patients stop working because of rheumatoid arthritis? Results of five years' follow up in 732 patients from the Early RA Study (ERAS).

A Young, J Dixey, E Kulinskaya, N Cox, P Davies, J Devlin, P Emery, A Gough, D James, P Prouse and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Sick leave as a predictor of job loss in patients with chronic arthritis.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2006
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

A YoungRheumatology Unit, City Hospital, St Albans, Herts AL3 5PN, UK. erascm@hotmail.com
J Dixey
E Kulinskaya
N Cox
P Davies
J Devlin
P Emery
A Gough
D James
P Prouse
P Williams
J Winfield

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the occurrence and prognostic factors for the ability to maintain paid work in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

settingInception cohort of patients with RA recruited from rheumatology departments in nine NHS Hospital Trusts in England. PATIENTS: All consecutive patients with RA of less than two years' duration, before any second line (disease modifying) drug treatment, and followed up for five years.

methodsClinical, laboratory, and radiological assessments, and all treatments were recorded prospectively using a standardised format at presentation and yearly. OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in, and loss of paid work by five years' follow up.

results732 patients completed the five year follow up. 353/721 (49%) were gainfully employed at the onset of RA, 211 (60%) were still working at five years, 104 (29%) stopped because of the disease, and 31 (9%) retired for reasons other than RA. Work disability at five years was more likely in manual workers (odds ratio (OR) 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4 to 3.8) and worse baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ>1.5, OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.38 to 3.7). In combination with other baseline variables (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, sex, age of onset, and radiological erosions), employment outcome was predicted in 78% using multivariate analysis.

conclusionsNearly half of the patients with RA were in paid employment at onset, work disability was an adverse outcome for a third of these patients by five years, and manual work and high baseline HAQ were important predictors for this. These details are likely to be useful to clinicians, health professionals, and patients in order to plan medical, orthopaedic, and remedial treatments in early RA. Future disease modifying treatments could be compared with this cohort of patients who were treated with conventional second line drugs.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidCohort StudiesDisability EvaluationEmploymentEnglandFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesProportional Hazards ModelsAntirheumatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID11874837
PMCPMC1754067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.