SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002
Primary care based clinics for asthma.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Nurse versus physician-led care for the management of asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Primary care based clinics for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- A qualitative study of stakeholder views of a community-based anticipatory care service for patients with COPD.Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2012Article
- An integrative review of systematic reviews related to the management of breathlessness in respiratory illnesses.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2010Review
- What evidence is there to support skill mix changes between GPs, pharmacists and practice nurses in the care of elderly people living in the community?Australia and New Zealand health policy · 2009Article
- IT-supported skill-mix change and standardisation in integrated eyecare: lessons from two screening projects in The Netherlands.International journal of integrated care · 2007Article
- Limited options: a report on GP access to services.Irish journal of medical science · 2007Article
- Organizational interventions to implement improvements in patient care: a structured review of reviews.Implementation science : IS · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary care clinics for asthma have been encouraged and are becoming widespread in some countries, particularly in the UK.
objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of organised asthma care via primary care based asthma clinics. SEARCH STRATEGY: A search of the Cochrane Airways Group register and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register using the following search strategy: clinic* OR general pract* OR family pract* or primary care. Separate and additional searches were also conducted using MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials had to be performed in primary care and be restricted to patients with asthma. Care could be delivered by doctor or nurse. Two reviewers independently ascertained the relevance of trials from titles and abstracts obtained from the searches. Relevant full text articles were retrieved with two reviewers assessing each study for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently conducted all data abstraction and analysis and all disagreements were resolved by discussion. For the dichotomous variables, odds ratio (OR) or relative risks (RR) with 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) were calculated for individual outcomes. MAIN
resultsOnly one trial met the criteria for inclusion in the review. This trial provided 11 outcome measures of which two showed a significant effect of the intervention. More patients in the intervention group had peak flow meters (RR 1.30; 95%CI 1.05,1.61) and fewer patients in the intervention group were likely to wake up at nights due to their asthma (RR 0.30; 95%CI 0.16, 0.81). REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThere is limited evidence of benefit for primary care based asthma clinics, but firm conclusions cannot be formed until more good quality trials have been carried out.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.